Baal Nimrod Apollo – Deified Deep State Transhumanist Satanist NWO God-King – Man of Many Names

Baal Nimrod – Deified Deep State Transhumanist Satanist NWO God-King – Man of Many Names

“Further complicated by the confounding of language, the post Babel world had many Nephilim, each of which were known by as many as 70 names by the various people groups. So 70 versions of the same character, and 70 different characters at least. Dagon for the Philistines, Chemosh for Moab, Molech for Ammon, Marduk for Babylon, Hadad (Baal) for the Canaanites, and so on.”

~Babylon, Babel & the Assembly of Gods

Nimrod tried to assault Heaven by going up. Nimrod’s long-time worshippers have many stories about his return and are even to this day attempting to raise him back to our realm from his current domain in the Underworld. Why? Because he was the only man who has ever made a serious attempt at waging physical warfare against GOD. And while killing God would not be possible, at least in theory, Nimrod’s plan to “reach into heaven” was actually possible. Imagine the implications of that!

~Gearing Up For Apollo: PART 2- Examining An Ancient Motive

[wbcr_css_snippet]: PHP snippets error (not passed the snippet ID)

Nimrods Tabernacle of Saturn

“Apollo’s mythos traces back through various sun gods in multiple cultures, all leading back to the “man of many names” known in the Bible as Nimrod. His goal, according to the Scriptures was as follows…

Genesis 11:4 And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.”

~Gearing Up For Apollo: PART 2- Examining An Ancient Motive

The Great Post Flood Apostate King Nimrod
The Great Post Flood Apostate King Nimrod

The Genesis Revelation Identifying the Beast – Rob Skiba

Nimrod was of the 2nd generation after the flood. His father was Cush, son of Ham, son of Noah. In Sumerian history, the second king of Uruk after the Flood was named Enmerkar, son of Mesh-ki-ang-gasher.

Those same clever Hebrew writers of the Old Testament, doing what they often did with language, transformed the name “Enmer” – the consonants N-M-R (Remember, there are no vowels in ancient Hebrew) – into Nimrod, which makes it sound like marad, the Hebrew word for “rebel.”

The king of Uruk, Nimrod, wanted to rebuild and expand the ancient, pre-Flood temple of Enki, the god Sumerians thanked for the gifts of civilization (the mes) and for creating the apkallu (the Watchers) – even though their interventions in human affairs, even according to Babylonian myths, was responsible for the Great Flood. This became known as the Tower of Babel.

Nimrods Many Names
Nimrods Many Names

Chart of Babeled gods
Chart of Babeled gods

Nimrod, Zeus, Baal, Molech, the many names of the Unholy King of the Occult Realm.

 

Baal (Allah) and Ashtaroth (Easter) in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam

 

ANTICHRIST NIMROD SEMIRAMIS TAMMUZ ANCIENT BABYLON WITCHCRAFT

 

Gilgamesh – The Nephilim King

 

The Tower of Babel:

“”Who commissioned the construction of the Tower of Babel? Traditions and sources outside the Scriptures identity the builder as Nimrod, who lived between 3500BC and 3100BC, a period of history called the Uruk Expansion. This tracks with what little the Scriptures tells us about Nimrod. In Genesis 10:10, we see “the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, Erech, Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar.””

~Babylon, Babel & the Assembly of Gods

What could possibly cause people who’d committed to building the largest ziggurat ever at the most ancient and important religious site in the known world to the top god of their fallen angel and Nephilim pantheon to quit? Why abandon Eridu and leave the E-abzu unfinished? Perhaps it was Genesis 11:8-9:

“Come, let us go down and there confuse their language, so that they may not understand one another’s speech.” So YHWH dispersed them from there over the face of all the earth, and they left off building the city. (Emphasis added)

God’s response was poetic and masterful, naturally, and he simply splintered the tongues (languages) of mankind into 70 different nations, “according to the number of the sons of God” or, under the control of various fallen angels which would then seek to go to war with one another over whose gods were stronger and various misunderstandings that arose from being unable to communicate. A house divided amongst itself cannot stand, and so God split the house of evil against itself. Much the same way he did with the Titans, turning them to war against one another.

It was here that the Language of Symbols was born, according to Freemason author AE. Waite. And the elite occult began to reconnect through universal symbols that did not require the spoken tongue.

“Out of evil comes good, however, and the confusion of tongues gave rise to ‘the ancient practice of Masons conversing without the use of speech.'”

~A.E. Waite.”

~Babylon, Babel & the Assembly of Gods

 

Deified Tyrant God-King of the Old World Order (The NWO One World Government seeks to rebuild this empire)

Nimrod, Or Baal as we best know him today, was a man who became a “god” (Nephilim Giant Hybrid) through transhumanist self ascension. As founder of the mystical freemasons, a secret society death cult that seeks to restore not only Nimrod’s One World Government and Religion in opposition to YHWH, the Creator – but in fact seeks to resurrect Nimrod himself.

In secret society terms, Baal is the antichrist-like King they’ve long awaited to finally realize world domination and the end of Christianity and #pureblood humanity. In Biblical terms, we know him as Apollyon the Destroyer.

Nimrod - The Rebel GodKing
Nimrod – The Rebel GodKing

 

Melqart - Nimrod's Many Names
Melqart – Nimrod’s Many Names

 

And just as the pagan Christmas Ritual, They plan to resurrect Nimrod

The Rulers of Darkness plan to use this body to resurrect their unholy King, Nimrod, (Who is essentially the antichrist, the Son of Perdition, the destroyer. The Man of Many Names) to lead the new world order to finally kill God, an original goal of the Tower of Babel.

Rulers of Darkness - Resurrection of Nimrod Goal
Rulers of Darkness – Resurrection of Nimrod Goal

 

“In Part 1 of this series, I began to draw together a few strings concerning some key players in a timeline of events, which I believe illustrates a gearing up for Apollo. As I covered in my Mythology and the Coming Great Deception videos as well as in my book, Babylon Rising: And The First Shall Be Last, Nimrod became known by many names after the confusion of tongues at the Tower of Babel. The two names that really seemed to take and hold firm even into our modern age are Osiris and Apollo. From the first century times of the New Testament to the modern era, both are still highly regarded by certain segments of the world’s elite, particularly through Secret Societies. Once your eyes are open to this, you will see a real undercurrent within certain movements and organizations, all pushing toward his return to the land of the living. In Part 2 of this series, I took a look at the ancient motives, which may be driving what likely could be at least a part of the Great Deception, which was promised by Yeshua to come upon us in these Last Days. In this blog, my goal will be to start with Nimrod and work my way forward through the late 19th Century and the start of the 20th Century where we’ll see a new attempt by man to kill God and bring about the reemergence of Nimrod. So here, we go…

 

Click to Enlarge

 

Click to Enlarge

Nimrod was born in 1908AM. He became king of the world in 1948AM. These are two very interesting dates in the 20th Century as well. In Part 2 of this series, we learned about the real intent of the Tower of Babel. It was to wage war with YHWH, God Almighty. After “reaching into heaven” through this tower construct, the plan was to assault Heaven and take over. The plan was thwarted by the confusion of the languages. This was a brilliant plan by YHWH. What ever pre-Flood knowledge, which may have been retained in Noah and his three sons, was instantly cut down – significantly.

Because “nothing which they have imagined to do would be restrained from them,” YHWH limited their imagination and ability to be so united in evil by separating not only by language, but also by accumulated knowledge. Now, instead of having many united with combined wisdom and understanding, there were many dispersed with fragments of knowledge and understanding and no one could communicate with the others. This caused a separation of proximity to occur. Man began to spread out across the earth, assembling into language groups, which would later develop into nations and ultimately what we would call “races.””

….

The ancient Hebrew texts say there were about 600,000 people at the time of the Tower of Babel, which got separated into 70 different language/people breeding groups. Within those groups, it is easy to imagine how YHWH could have separated them by similar facial/body features when He confounded the languages. Over time, certain traits would have thus manifested more in some groups than in others and been retained by specific language groups as defining characteristics. Now we have a wide variety of shapes, colors and sizes in humans, just as we do in dogs, which should all be embraced and appreciated not persecuted and rejected.

Side note: Many subscribe to the notion that Shem is the father of Middle Easterners and Asians, Japheth is the father of Europeans and Ham is the father of Africans. This is largely due to charts like this, depicting the Genesis 10 “Table of Nations”:

While it is true that, by in large, these are the areas where the descendants of Noah’s three sons settled, we can not draw such defining lines. First of all, by the time we get to the Tower of Babel, if the Jasher account is true, there were some 600,000 men living at the time. That’s not counting the women. According to Genesis 11, they were all gathered together into one place (the plains of Shinar) and were thus thoroughly intermingling with one another – for more than 300 years since the Flood. So, if you have the mistaken idea that Shem was Asian/Middle Eastern in appearance and Japheth was white and Ham was black, you need to rethink that idea. (Nemos Notes: Ham’s Son, Cush, may be the first black man, whose name translates to Black: Terror and whose name appears all over ancient African history and mythology.) Where have you ever heard of one man producing three different colored children of differing facial structures? No. The three sons all favored their parents. Besides, by the time you get to the Tower of Babel, the cousins of this family would all be quite mixed by this time anyway. So, you can’t isolate one people group per son, even if they were vastly different in appearance.

Furthermore, while many want to assign all people of African descent to Ham, we must note that his children were the most prolific and widespread. His son Canaan settled the Levant, right in the middle of where Shem’s children eventually settled. Ham’s son Phut settled north Africa and Cush settled in east Africa. But Ham’s grandson Caphtor, son of Mizraim (who settled in Egypt) settled the island of Crete. His children later settled both Greece as well as the Levant. Thus, it would seem that at least a fair amount of Europeans trace back to Ham too.

Over time, as men began to learn the other languages, intermingling clearly happened once again. So, I completely reject the idea of categorizing “races” by the three sons of Noah, who would have all looked the same as their father, who himself would have looked the same as the first man, Adam. Therefore, as already discussed above, the differences in size, shape and color did not originate with three sons from the same father, somehow all looking totally different from one another. No. Rather, the differences came much later, over time as the result of controlled breeding due to the selective population centers, which resulted from the confusion of languages at the Tower of Babel.

~Excerpt, Gearing Up For Apollo: Part 3 – A Time of Great Change… And The Death of God

Godly or evil? Who is… Nimrod
by Bible archaeologist Dr. David P. Livingston, Associates for Bible Research

Page Contents
Nimrod revealed
Cultural Connections in the Ancient Near East
Was “Nimrod” Godly or Evil?
The Gilgamesh Epic
Gilgamesh is Nimrod
Gilgamesh Confronts YHWH!
Putting the Evidence Together—the Bible and the Gilgamesh Epic
References and Bibliography
ALSO SEE
Nimrod revealed
The Bible states…

Cush was the father of Nimrod, who grew to be a mighty warrior on the Earth. He was a mighty hunter before the LORD; that is why it is said, “Like Nimrod, a mighty hunter before the LORD.” The centers of his kingdom were Babylon, Erech, Akkad and Calneh in Shinar (Genesis 10:8-10).

Copyrighted
Originally established by Nimrod (Genesis 10:11), and today known as Nimrud, the ancient city of Calah became an important and as now located in Iraq. The artist’s reconstruction above shows the interior of Tiglath-pileser III’s palace there (late seventh century BC).
ABR file photo
Copyrighted
Nineveh was also part of Nimrod’s kingdom (Genesis 10:11). Nineveh along the Tigris River continued to be a major city in ancient Assyria. Today adjacent to modern Mosul, Iraq, the ruins of ancient Nineveh are centered on two mounds, the acropolis at Kuyunjik and Nebi Yunis (Arabic for “Prophet Jonah”). Pictured here is Sennacherib’s “palace without rival” on Kuyunjik, constructed at the end of the seventh century BC and excavated by Henry Layard in the early 20th century.
ABR file photo
description_description_description
The Babylonian Flood Story is told on the 11th tablet of the Gilgamesh Epic, almost 200 lines of poetry on 12 clay tablets inscribed in cuneiform script. A number of different versions of the Gilgamesh Epic have been found around the ancient Near East, most dating to the seventh century BC. The most complete version came from the library of Ashurbanipal at Nineveh. Commentators agree that the story comes from a much earlier period, not too long after the Flood as described in the story.
ABR file photo
Many consider this to be a positive, complimentary testimony about Nimrod. It is just the opposite! First, a little background study is necessary.

Cultural Connections in the Ancient Near East
Besides the stories of the Creation and Flood in the Bible there ought to be similar stories on clay tablets found in the cultures near and around the true believers. These tablets may have a reaction, or twisted version, in their accounts of the Creation and Flood.

In the post-Flood genealogical records of Genesis 10 we note that the sons of Ham were: Cush, Mizraim, Put and Canaan. Mizraim became the Egyptians. No one is sure where Put went to live. And it is obvious who the Canaanites were. Cush lived in the “land of Shinar” which most scholars consider to be Sumer. There developed the first civilization after the Flood. The sons of Shem-the Semites-were also mixed, to some extent, with the Sumerians.

We suggest that Sumerian Kish, the first city established in Mesopotamia after the Flood, took its name from the man known in the Bible as Cush.

The first kingdom established after the Flood was Kish, and the name “Kish” appears often on clay tablets. The early post-Flood Sumerian king lists (not found in the Bible) say that “kingship descended from heaven to Kish” after the Flood. (The Hebrew name “Cush,” much later, was moved to present-day Ethiopia as migrations took place from Mesopotamia to other places.)

The Sumerians, very early, developed a religio-politico state which was extremely binding on all who lived in it (except for the rulers, who were a law unto themselves). This system was to influence the Ancient Near East for over 3000 years. Other cultures which followed the Sumerian system were Accad, Babylon, Assyria, and Persia, which became the basis of Greece and Rome’s system of rule. Founded by Cush, the Sumerians were very important historically and Biblically.

Was “Nimrod” Godly or Evil?
First, what does the name Nimrod mean? It comes from the Hebrew verb marad, meaning “rebel.” Adding an “n” before the “m” it becomes an infinitive construct, “Nimrod.” (see Kautzsch 1910: 137 2b, also BDB 1962: 597). The meaning then is “The Rebel.” Thus “Nimrod” may not be the character’s name at all. It is more likely a derisive term of a type, a representative, of a system that is epitomized in rebellion against the Creator, the one true God. Rebellion began soon after the Flood as civilizations were restored. At that time this person became very prominent.

Copyrighted
Nimrod was a very significant man in ancient times, the grandson of Ham and great-grandson of Noah. Nimrod started his kingdom at Babylon (Genesis 10:10). Babylon later reached its zenith under Nebuchadnezzar (sixth century BC). Pictured above are mudbrick ruins of Nebuchadnezzar’s city along with ancient wall lines and canals in modern day Iraq.
ABR file photo
In Genesis 10:8-11 we learn that “Nimrod” established a kingdom. Therefore, one would expect to find also, in the literature of the ancient Near East, a person who was a type, or example, for other people to follow. And there was. It is a well-known tale, common in Sumerian literature, of a man who fits the description. In addition to the Sumerians, the Babylonians wrote about this person; the Assyrians likewise; and the Hittites. Even in Israel, tablets have been found with this man’s name on them. He was obviously the most popular hero in the Ancient Near East.

The Gilgamesh Epic
The person we are referring to found in extra-Biblical literature was Gilgamesh. The first clay tablets naming him were found among the ruins of the temple library of the god Nabu (Biblical Nebo) and the palace library of Ashurbanipal in Nineveh. Many others have been found since in a number of excavations. The author of the best treatise on the Gilgamesh Epic says,

The date of the composition of the Gilgamesh Epic can therefore be fixed at about 2000 BC. But the material contained on these tablets is undoubtedly much older, as we can infer from the mere fact that the epic consists of numerous originally independent episodes, which, of course, did not spring into existence at the time of the composition of our poem but must have been current long before they were compiled and woven together to form our epic (Alexander Heidel, 1963: 15).

Yet his arrogance, ruthlessness and depravity were a subject of grave concern for the citizens of Uruk (his kingdom). They complained to the great god Anu, and Anu instructed the goddess Aruru to create another wild ox, a double of Gilgamesh, who would challenge him and distract his mind from the warrior’s daughter and the noblemen’s spouse, whom it appears he would not leave in peace (Roux 1966: 114).

The Epic of Gilgamesh has some very indecent sections. Alexander Heidel, first translator of the epic, had the decency to translate the vilest parts into Latin. Spieser, however, gave it to us “straight” (Pritchard 1955: 72).

With this kind of literature in the palace, who needs pornography? Gilgamesh was a vile, filthy man. Yet the myth says of him that he was “2/3 god and 1/3 man.”

Gilgamesh is Nimrod
Copyrighted
Found at Khorsabad, this eighth century BC stone relief is identified as Gilgamesh. The best-known of ancient Mesopotamian heroes, Gilgamesh was king of Uruk in southern Mesopotamia. His story is known in the poetic Gilgamesh Epic, but there is no historical evidence for his exploits in the story. He is described as part god and part man, a great builder and warrior, and a wise man in the story. Not mentioned in the Bible, the author suggests Gilgamesh is to be identified with Biblical Nimrod (Genesis 10:8-12). —Dr. David Livingston, Associates for Biblical Research
How does Gilgamesh compare with “Nimrod?” Ancient historian Josephus says of Nimrod,

Now it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront and contempt of God. He was the grandson of Ham, the son of Noah-a bold man, and of great strength of hand. He persuaded them not to ascribe it to God, as if it were through his means they were happy, but to believe that it was their own courage which procured that happiness. He also gradually changed the government into tyranny-seeing no other way of turning men from the fear of God, but to bring them into a constant dependence upon his own power.

Copyrighted
He also said he would be revenged on God, if he should have a mind to drown the world again; for that he would build a tower too high for the waters to be able to reach! and that he would avenge himself on God for destroying their forefathers! (Ant. I: iv: 2)

What Josephus says here is precisely what is found in the Gilgamesh epics. Gilgamesh set up tyranny, he opposed YHWH and did his utmost to get people to forsake Him.

Two of the premiere commentators on the Bible in Hebrew have this to say about Genesis 10:9,

Nimrod was mighty in hunting, and that in opposition to YHWH; not ‘before YHWH’ in the sense of according to the will and purpose of YHWH, still less,… in a simply superlative sense… The name itself, ‘Nimrod’ from marad, ‘We will revolt,’ points to some violent resistance to God… Nimrod as a mighty hunter founded a powerful kingdom; and the founding of this kingdom is shown by the verb with consecutive to have been the consequence or result of his strength in hunting, so that hunting was intimately connected with the establishing of the kingdom. Hence, if the expression ‘a mighty hunter’ relates primarily to hunting in the literal sense, we must add to the literal meaning the figurative signification of a ‘hunter of men’ (a trapper of men by stratagem and force); Nimrod the hunter became a tyrant, a powerful hunter of men (Keil and Delitzsch 1975: 165).

“in the face of YHWH” can only mean ‘in defiance of YHWH’ as Josephus and the Targums understand it (op. cit.: 166).

And the proverb must have arisen when other daring and rebellious men followed in Nimrod’s footsteps and must have originated with those who saw in such conduct an act of rebellion against the God of salvation, in other words, with the possessors of the divine promise of grace (loc. cit.).

After the Flood there was, at some point, a breakaway from YHWH. Only eight people descended from the Ark. Those people worshipped YHWH. But at some point an influential person became opposed to YHWH and gathered others to his side. I suggest that Nimrod is the one who did it. Cain had done similarly before the Flood, founding a new city and religious system.

Our English translation of the Hebrew of Genesis 10:8-10 is weak. The author of this passage of Scripture will not call Gilgamesh by his name and honor him, but is going to call him by a derisive name, what he really is-a rebel. Therefore we should translate Genesis 10:8-10 to read,

Cush begat Nimrod; he began to be a tyrant in the Earth. He was a tyrannical hunter in opposition to the Lord. Thus it is said, ‘Nimrod the tyrannical opponent of YHWH.’

Likewise, Gilgamesh was a man who took control by his own strength. In Genesis 10 Nimrod is presented as a type of him. Nimrod’s descendents were the ones who began building the tower in Babel where the tongues were changed. Gilgamesh is a type of early city founders.

(Page numbers below are from Alexander Heidel 1963)

He is a “shepherd” page 18
From Uruk
(Kramer, 1959, page 31 calls Uruk “Erech”) page 17
A giant (11 cubits) page 17
Builds cities page 17
Vile man “takes women” page 18
Mighty hunter page 18
Gilgamesh Confronts YHWH!
The name of YHWH rarely appears in extra-Biblical literature in the Ancient Near East. Therefore we would not expect to find it in the Gilgamesh epic. But why should the God of the Jews rarely be mentioned? The Hebrew Bible is replete with the names of other gods.

On the other hand, the nations surely knew of Him even though they had no respect for Him. If so, how might His Name appear in their literature, if at all? The name of YHWH, in a culture which is in rebellion against His rule, would most likely be in a derisive form, not in its true form. Likewise, the writers of Scripture would deride the rebels.

Copyrighted
This face supposedly represents Huwawa who, according to the Gilgamesh’s Epic, sent the Flood on the Earth. According to the story, Huwawa (Humbaba in the Assyrian version) was killed by Gilgamesh and his half man, half beast friend, Enkidu. The author suggests Huwawa is the ancient pagan perspective of Yahweh (YHWH), the God of the Bible. About 3 in (7.5 cm), this mask is dated to around the 6th century BC. Of an unknown provenance, it is now in the British Museum. —THORKILD JACOBSEN
Putting the Evidence Together—the Bible and the Gilgamesh Epic
The Gilgamesh Epic describes the first “God is dead” movement. In the Epic, the hero is a vile, filthy, perverted person, yet he is presented as the greatest, strongest, hero that ever lived (Alexander Heidel, 1963: 18). So that the one who sent the Flood will not trouble them anymore, Gilgamesh sets out to kill the perpetrator. He takes with him a friend who is a monstrous half-man, half-animal-Enkidu. Together they go on a long journey to the Cedar Mountain to find and destroy the monster who sent the Flood. Gilgamesh finds him and finally succeeds in cutting off the head of this creature whose name is “Huwawa” (“Humbaba” in the Assyrian version; see Heidel 1963: 34ff).

Is there a connection with the Gilgamesh epic and Genesis 10? Note what Gilgamesh says to Enkidu the half man, half beast, who accompanied him on his journey, found in Tablet III, lines 147-150.

“If I fall,” Gilgamesh says, “I will establish a name for myself. Gilgamesh is fallen, they will say, in combat with terrible Huwawa.”

But the next five lines are missing from all tablets found so far! Can we speculate on what they say? Let’s try… We suggest that those five lines include,

“But if I win, …they will say, Gilgamesh, the mighty vanquisher of Huwawa!”

Why do we say that? Because Genesis 10:9 gives us the portion missing from the Gilgamesh tablets. Those lines include. “it is said, Nimrod (or Gilgamesh) the mighty vanquisher of YHWH.” This has to be what is missing from all the clay tablets of the Gilgamesh story. The Gilgamesh Epic calls him Huwawa; the Bible calls Him YHWH.

Alexander Heidel, speaking of the incident as it is found on Tablet V says,

All we can conclude from them [the lost lines] is that Gilgamesh and Enkidu cut off the head of Humbaba (or Huwawa) and that the expedition had a successful issue [ending] (1963: 47).

The missing lines from the Epic are right there in the Bible!

Because of the parallels between Gilgamesh and Nimrod, many scholars agree that Gilgamesh is Nimrod. Continuing with Gilgamesh’s fable, he did win, he did vanquish Huwawa and took his head. Therefore, he could come back to Uruk and other cities and tell the people not to worry about YHWH anymore, he is dead. “I killed him over in the Lebanon mountains. So just live however you like, I will be your king and take care of you.”

There are still other parallels between the Bible and the Gilgamesh epic:

“YaHWeH” has a somewhat similar sound to “Huwawa.” Gilgamesh did just as the “sons of god” in Genesis 6 did.

The “sons of god” forcibly took men’s wives. The Epic says that is precisely what Gilgamesh did.

The Bible calls Nimrod a tyrant, and Gilgamesh was a tyrant.

There was a flood in the Bible; there is a flood in the Epic.

Cush is mentioned in the Bible, Kish in the Epic.

Erech is mentioned in Scripture; Uruk was Gilgamesh’s city.

Gilgamesh made a trip to see the survivor of the Flood. This was more likely Ham than Noah, since “Nimrod” was Ham’s grandson!

Historically, Gilgamesh was of the first dynasty of Uruk. As Jacobsen points out (1939: 157), kings before Gilgamesh may be fictional, but not likely. The fact that the Gilgamesh epic also contains the Deluge story would indicate a close link with events immediately following the Flood. S.N. Kramer says,

A few years ago one would have strongly doubted his (historical) existence… we now have the certitude that the time of Gilgamesh corresponds to the earliest period of Mesopotamian history. (Kramer 1959: 117)

What a contrast Psalm 2 is compared with the Gilgamesh Epic!

Why do the nations conspire and the peoples plot in vain? The kings of the Earth take their stand and the rulers gather together against the LORD and against his Anointed One. “Let us break their chains,” they say, “and throw off their fetters.” The One enthroned in heaven laughs, the Lord scoffs at them. Then he rebukes them in his anger and terrifies them in his wrath, saying, “I have installed my King on Zion, my holy hill.” I will proclaim the decree of the LORD: He said to me, “you are my Son, today I have become your Father, Ask of me, and I will make the nations your inheritance, the ends of the Earth your possession. You will rule them with an iron scepter; you will dash them to pieces like pottery.”

Therefore, you kings, be wise; he warned, you rulers of the Earth. Serve the LORD with fear and rejoice with trembling. Kiss the Son, lest he be angry and you be destroyed in your way, for his wrath can flare up in a moment. Blessed are all who take refuge in him.

References and Bibliography
Brown, F., Driver, S.R., and Briggs, C.A. (abbreviated to BDB), A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament.Oxford (Clarendon Press, 1962).
Cassuto, U., A Commentary on the Book of Genesis, 2 vols. (Jerusalem: Magnes, 1964).
Frankfort, H., Kingship and the Gods (Chicago: University Press, 1948).
Heidel, Alexander, The Gilgamesh Epic and Old Testament Parallels (Chicago: University Press, 1963).
Jacobsen, T., The Sumerian Kinglist (Chicago: University Press, 1939).
Josephus, Jewish Antiquities. Books IIII (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, Loeb Classics, 1998).
Kautzsch, E., editor, Genesius’ Hebrew Grammar (Oxford: Clarendon, 1910).
Kramer, S. N., editor, History Begins at Sumer (Garden City NY: Doubleday, 1959).
Keil, C. F., and Delitzsch, P. Commentary on the Old Testament, vol. 1 (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1975).
Pritchard, J., Ancient Near Eastern Texts and the Old Testament, 3rd edition (Princeton: University Press, 1969).
Roux, G., Ancient Iraq, 3rd edition (Harmondsworth, Middlesex, UK: Penguin, 1992).
Thomas, D.W., Documents From Old Testament Times (New York: Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1958).
Author: Dr. David P. Livingston, Associates for Biblical Research.
Originally published in ABR’s BIBLE AND SPADE 14.3 (2001), pp. 67-72.

See Original

 

 

Related:

Babylon, Babel & the Assembly of Gods
The Rulers of Darkness – The Illuminati’s Greatest Secrets Revealed
Seed War – Dead Sea Scrolls Reveal The Secrets of the End Times & The Mystery Religion of The Deep State
Clinton Emails – FOIA – Nimrod/Gilgamesh/Nephilim and a Resurrection Chamber?
The “Nimrod” Tree – “NIMROD” – The LORD of Christmas
Christmas – A Pagan Infiltration of Christianity – Has Nothing To Do with Christ
Baal – Deified Deep State Transhumanist Satanist NWO God-King Nimrod – Man of Many Names
The Alien Deception – Alchemically Resurrecting the Ancient Gods
The First Shall Be Last – Nimrod the Antichrist
Tomb of Nephilim Giant Gilgamesh Found & Hillary Asks for Access to His Resurrection/Rejuvenation Technology in Leaked Emails
The Tomb of Gilgamesh – Nimrod – Osiris – Apollo
The Man of Sin – Of the Coming of the Antichrist, the Son of Perdition
Tom Horn on Abaddon Ascending
Gilgamesh – The Nephilim King

 

TEFLON ANTICHRIST: Even The Elect Shall Be Deceived

In Case You Missed It:

Hidden History: They are Hiding God, the Firmament, & The Seed War (/w Guest Mark Sargent)

Primordial Truth: Mapping the Rabbit Holes – Know Everything!

Nemos News is 100% listener funded. Thank you for your support in our mission to Break the Cycle of Fake News.

For breaking news from one of the most over the target and censored names in the world join our 100% Free newsletter at www.NemosNewsNetwork.com/news

Also follow us at Gab

If you value our work please consider supporting us with our vetted patriot sponsors!

www.NemosNewsNetwork.com/sponsors

Shop Patriot & Detox the Deep State with RedPillLiving.com, Home of Sleepy Joe – the world’s most powerful all natural sleep formula & The Great Awakening Gourmet Coffee for Patriots.

“Our Specialty, is Waking People Up.”

Other Links

Join our Telegram chat: www.NemosNewsNetwork.com/chat