“But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?”
~Matthew 3:7, reflecting upon Yeshuah speaking to the Jewish Talmudists.
But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows’ houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.
For proof that the Pharisees are today’s Jews let us first see what the Jews, themselves, have to say on the subject.
Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, page 474,”The Jewish religion, as it is today, traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of their literature; the study which is essential for a real understanding of Pharisaism (Talmudism).
From Encyclopedia Judaica – Rabbi Louis Finkelstein was chosen by the Kehilla (Jewish community) as one of the top- 120 Jews who best represent “a lamp of Judaism to the world. ” He headed the Jewish Theological Seminary in New York. (One of his star Pupils was former Chief Justice Earl Warren; see Who’s Who in America.
We quote from Finkelstein’s two volume work, “The Pharisees.” “Pharisaism became Talmudism, but the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered. When the Jew studies the Talmud, he is actually repeating the arguments used in the Palestinian academies. From Pakistan to Babylonia, from’ Babylonia to North Africa, Italy, Spain, France and Germany; from there to Poland, Russia and eastern Europe generally,’ ancient Pharisaism has wandered. ”
Finkelstein further states “The Talmud derives its authority from the position held by the ancient Pharisaic academides. The teachers of those academies, both of Babylonia and of Palestine, were considered successors of the older Sanhedrin. At the present time, the Jewish people have no living authority comparable in status to the ancient Sanhedrin. Any decision regarding the Jewish religion must be based on the Talmud as the final resume of the teaching of those authorities when they existed. ”
From the New York Herald-Tribune, Nov. 17, 1959, a quote from “The Talmud: Heart’s Blood Of The Jewish Faith” by Herman Wouk, a leading Jewish writer. “The Talmud is to this day the circulating heart’s blood of the Jewish religion. Whatever laws, customs or ceremonies we observe – whether we are Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or merely spasmodic sentimentalists we follow the Talmud. It is our common Law. ”
Stephen S. Wise, deceased, and formerly Chief Rabbi of the United States stated, “The return from Babylon and the adoption of the Babylonian Talmud marked the end of Hebrewism and the beginning of Judaism. ”
The Babylonian Talmud was originally called “The Tradition of the Elders” (laws of men). The Jews confirm this when talking to Christ in Matthew 15: 2, “Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? For they wash not their hands when they eat bread. ” Christ answered in the next verse “Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?” Matthew 15: 9, “But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines, the commandments of men. ”
Every law in the Bible is diametrically opposed by the Talmud. Every act described as evil and vile is considered good by these Talmudic worshipping Pharisees. The basic belief of the Pharisees and the basic theme of the Talmud are identical. ONLY THE JEWS ARE HUMAN, ALL OTHERS ARE CATTLE TO BE USED AS SLAVES. This seems evil, but most do not realize that the Pharisees were (and are) descended from Canaanite (and perhaps Amalekite and other tribes) Nephilim who were also following the Will of Canaan.
In the 23rd chapter of Matthew, Christ identifies the Jews by calling them Pharisees, not once but nine times. He heaps upon them the most scathing. denunciation ever recorded, calling them thieves, liars, hypocrites, murderers, etc., even responsible for all who have been killed upon this earth including the righteous Abel. Christ could not make this statement if the Jews were not descendants of Satan through the Seedline of the Serpent. Yet Christians go to church Sunday after Sunday, sit back in their pew and, without raising any objection, listen to their minister state that Christ was a liar, murderer, pervert, child of Satan and a Pharisee, for that is what he is actually saying when he calls Christ a Jew. It really boils down to this: you must choose between two contradictory statements, both cannot be true.
EITHER YOUR MINISTER IS A LIAR, OR CHRIST IS.
For example, all the early Church Fathers identified Canaan with Phoenicia and Canaan which for many centuries, considered as names of the same country. This history is also found in the Bible in passages such as Exodus vi. 15. with Gen. xlvi. 10. and Exod. xvi. 33. with Josh. v. 12., in which passages, for the Hebrew words translated Canaanitish and land of Canaan, the Septuagint reads Phoenician and the country of Phoenicia.
The name Kenaan is preserved on a coin of Laodicea of the time of Antiochus Epiphanes, whereon Laodicea is styled “a mother city in Canaan,” ללארכא אם בכנען Kna or Chnd (Χνᾶ ) is mentioned distinctly by Herodian as the old name of Phoenicia. Hence, as Phoenicians or Canaanites were the most powerful of all tribes in Palestine at the time of its invasion by Joshua, the Israelites, in speaking of their own territory as it was before the conquest, called it “the land of Canaan.”
Homer, the ancient Greek poet (c. 1000 B.C.) is the earliest source mentioning “Phoenicians (Phoinikes – Phoiniké) from Tyre and Sidon” and telling of “Sidon which is in Phoenicia”. We quote from the 23rd chapter of Matthew starting with verse 13:
“But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men; for ye neither go in yourselves, neither permit them that are entering to go in. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye devour your widow’s houses, and for a pretense make long prayers; therefore, ye shall receive the greater damnation.
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him, twofold more the child of hell then yourselves. Woe unto you, ye blind guides, who say, ‘whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor! Ye fools and blind; for which is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold? And, whosoever shall swear by the altar it is nothing; but whosoever sweareth by the gift that is upon it, he is bound.
Ye fools and blind; for which is greater, the gift, or the altar that sanctifieth the gift? Whosoever, therefore, shall swear by the altar, sweareth by it, and by all things on it. And whosoever shall swear by the temple, sweareth by it, and by him that dwelleth in it. And he that shall swear by heaven, sweareth by the throne of God, and by him who sitteth on it. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, justice, mercy and faith; these ought ye to have done not to leave the other undone. Ye blind guides, who strain at a gnat and swallow a camel.
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye make clean the outside of the cup and the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess. Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye are like whited sepulchers, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness. Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! Because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchers of the righteous, and say ‘if we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets.’ Wherefore ye are witnesses against yourselves, that ye are the sons of them who killed the prophets. Fill up then the measure of your fathers.
Ye serpents, ye generation (race) of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets and wise men and scribes; and some of them ye shall kill and crucify, and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city, that upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zechariah, son of Barachiah, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar. Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation (this race).”
For a clear understanding of Pharisaism (Judaism), it is essential that you have some knowledge of the Talmud. Jewish youngsters are sent to Talmudic school at an early age to study these insane writings. Such perversity and filth is so inconceivable to an Adamite man, that if you quote a passage, he is unable to accept it as being true. He must read it for himself in black and white. Then, and only then, will he realize that Talmudists are not Adamites. THEY ARE SATANIC MUTATIONS AND ABOMINATIONS IN THE EYES OF GOD. Following are a few selected excerpts, followed by the name of the book and the page number. They prove beyond any reasonable doubt, that only a race with genetic insanity (or evil) could govern their lives by the rules of the Talmud.
1 – Unnatural intercourse does not cause a woman to be forbidden to marry a High Priest. YEB. 59A-59B. Often the rabbis go into pages of imbecilic explanations of these laws; the following is typical: “A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a High Priest unless specifically warned in advance and the act seen by two witnesses. If she had intercourse with a dog while sweeping the floor, she is likewise reckoned to be pure. “
2 – A goy (any non-Jew) who studies the Torah deserves death, for it is written, it is our inheritance, not theirs. SANHEDRIN 59A.
3 – Adam had intercourse with every beast and animal but found no satisfaction until he cohabited with Eve. YEB. 63A.
4 – Baby girls of three invoke sadistic punishments on those who have intercourse with them when they are menstruating. SAN. 55B and 69A. (Typical Jewish insanity as this is a physical impossibility.)
5 – When a baby girl has attained the age of three years and a day, she is fit for cohabitation. YEB. 60B.
6 – Women who are unclean (menstruating) must remain separate but only during the day time. HORAYOTH 4A.
7 – The temple can accept money given by a man to a harlot to associate with his dog. SOTAH 268.
8 – No occupation is inferior to that of agriculture. YEB. 63A.
9 – Jesus is in hell. His punishment is being boiled in hot semen. GITTEN 57A.
10 – Christians are boiled in hot excrement. GITTEN 57A.
11 – Jesus committed bestiality with his ass. SANH. 105A and B.
12 – There is a tale in ABODAH ZARAH, page 17A, about a rabbi who visited every harlot in the world, crossing seven rivers to reach the last one, but he was allowed to die in peace because he had not committed the one unforgivable sin, adopting Christianity.
13 – Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew, also sodomy with a neighbor’s wife. SANH. 58B.
14 – Murdering Christians is the same as killing a wild animal. SANH. 78B and 79A.
15 – If a woman sported lewdly with her young son, a minor, and he committed cohabitation with her; he renders her unfit for the priesthood, unless he is under eight years of age. SANH. 470.
16 – Intercourse is permitted with a dead relative regardless of whether she was single or married. YEB.55B
17 – A baby girl under three years and one day is always reckoned as a virgin because if she had intercourse previously, the hymen would grow back. KETHO BOTH 10B and 11A.
This insane dribble goes on page after page, book after book, completely obsessed with sex, perversion, sodomy and fanatical hatred for Christ, Christians and Christianity. Are the Talmudists literally and genetically insane? Let us check what the encyclopedia and the world’s leading authorities on mental diseases have to say.
From the Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 9, under nervous diseases: “The Jews are more subject to nervous diseases than the other races. HYSTERIA and NEU- RASTHENIA appear to be the most frequent. Physicians of large experience among Jews have gone so far as to state that most of them are NEURASTHENIC and HYSTERICAL. Tobler claims that in Palestine all Jewish women are hysterical. Raymond states that in Warsaw, Poland – hysteria is frequent among both Jewish men and women. Kraft Ebing states in Austria and Germany the neurotic taint of the Jews is obvious. That nervous diseases, especially neurasthenia, affects the Jews with exceptional severity. (From “Nervositat und Neurasthenic Zustande” page 54.) Erb, Jolly, Mobius, Lowenfeld, Oppenheim Fere, Charcqt, Bauveret and most of the other world renowned specialists in mental diseases speak of this in their writings on neurasthenia and hysteria, pointing out that hysteria in the mate, which is so rare in other races, is frequent among the Jews. ” The Jewish Encyclopedia goes on to say “Jews at an early age spend a great deal of time studying the Talmud and this is a contributing factor. ”
Dr. Rudolph Wasserman, a Jew, writing in “Zeitschrift fur Sozialwissenchaft, ” page 663, “We have in figures an abundant material which shows that Jews in particular, are subject to cerebral maladies and among specialists, there is unanimity to acknowledge it.”
Dr. M. J. Crittman, a Jew, in “Zeitschrift fur Demographie,” page 112: “Dementia Praecox is a mental disease which is extraordinarily frequent with the Jews.”
Dr Joseph A. Jacobs, a Jew, in “The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain” published in 1886, val. 15, page 360; has lists comparing high percentage of Jews having mental diseases.
“Jews and Judaism of Today” by Kreppel, 1925 edition, page 387, “As to dementia, it has been established the percentage of Jews is three times greater than Christians. ”
Dr. Alexander Pilez, world famous psychiatrist from Vienna, states in his outstanding work “Wiener Klinische Rundschau” page 888, “Cases where acute psychoses tend to idiocy and lunacy are of particular frequency with the Jews. The disposition of Jews for psychoses based on hereditary degenerescense is so great that it is completely out of proportion. Proportionately the higher classes of Jews are more tainted than the lower ones. My figures would be much higher if I included the numerous cases where a psychic atavism does not require the asylum (milder cases). These are results of heredity and degenerescense. One is dazzled at the greatness of the Iewish percentage.”
“Official Statistics For The German Reich, ” vol. 419, page 58, gives the census figures for 1925-1926 and a comparison between Protestant, Catholic and Jewish patients. (This was the Weimar Republic with the Jews in full control.) “A most striking fact is the high percentage of Jewish imbeciles. Our statistics confirm what careful research has documented, that it is a special disposition which afflicts the Jewish population with an excessive number of imbeciles. Most authorities find cause for it in a hereditary tendency; further, the accumulation of Jews in large cities increases the danger of syphilitic infection and of the progressive paralysis which it produces. ”
More identical statements by universally famous authorities on the degenerescense of Jews, their natural propensity to insanity, idiocy, imbecility, lunacy, megalomania and neurasthenia can be found in the following volumes:
Dr. Hans Ullman, “Archive fur Rasses and Gesselsohafts Biologie. ”
Dr. Razas Anski, “Aerzil Zeitschrift, ” on Jews of Russia.
Dr. Stephan, “Wekbl Voor Geneestle, ” on Jews in Holland.
Dr. Slivagni, “Rivista Critica de Clinica Medicale.
Dr. Kraeplin, “Transactions of The Pathological Society of London. ”
Dr Kraft Ebing, “Prag. Zeitscher fur Heilk.
Drs. Savage and Eikle, “Journal of Pathology.
Dr. Hoppe, “Journal of Jewish Demography. ”
Dr. Max Sichel, “Mental Maladies Among Jews.
Many of these modern’ day Pharisees also have an inherited biological disease called TAY SACHS, which is incurable and makes them paranoid. One of the symptoms is a feeling that he is always being persecuted. Even the slightest disagreement with a Jew, or Jewish policy, brings forth screams of Anti- Semitism. Yet throughout history the Jew has been the persecutor, the destroyer, even to those nations who, through ignorance, have welcomed him.
I believe we have pretty well established that the Talmud is nothing but the imbecilic ramblings of insane minds. We have the opinions of the world’s leading authorities on mental diseases; but we have to go a little further for final incontestable truth. Does the behavior pattern of the Jews throughout recorded history substantiate our thesis, or does it not?
1. They were responsible for the killing of thousands of children throughout Palestine in the hope of killing the Christ Child.
2. Killed Christ in the most cruel and sadistic way they could think of.
3. Were doing everything in their power to destroy Rome and take over.
4. Nero’s foremost advisor was the Jew Attilius and his favorite mistress, the Jewess Poppea. Under their influence, he tortured and killed thousands of Christians.
5. Cassius, the world famous historian wrote in his “Roman History, ” translated by Anthoine de Bandole in 1660: “The Jews who lived along Cyrenea, having for their captain a certain Ancireas, killed all the Greeks and Romans, ate their flesh and entrails, bathed in their blood and dressed with their skins. They very cruelly killed some of them sawing from the tops of their head down through the middle of the body. They threw some to the beasts and forced one to fight against the other, so much so that they brought death to 220, 000. ”
“Decline and Fall of The Roman Empire ” by Gibbons, “In Cyrenea, Jews slaughtered 220,000 Greeks, 240,000 in the isle of Cyprus and in Egypt a great multitude of people. Most of the miserable victims were sawed alength. ”
7. The Jewish book “Sepher Hadoroth ” states that the Jews convinced Emperor Antoninus that the Nazarenes were the cause of a pestilence, so he executed all the Nazarenes who were in Rome, A.D. 155.
8. Another Jewish book, “Sepher Juchasin, ” states on page 108, “Upon the desire of the Jews, Diocletian killed 3 great many Christians including the popes Caius and Marcellinus. ” To continue with Jewish culture and accomplishments let us jump ahead to modern history; events that you may have some knowledge of.
9. From the book “How Odd of God” by Rabbi Lewis Browne, “No agitators did more to bring in the French Revolution of 1848 than the two Jews, Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne. It was a Jew Leon Trotsky who led the Red Army which saved the communist cause in Russia. It was a Jew, Carl Liebnecht, aided by a Jewess, Rosa Luxembourg who led the insurrection in Germany. A Jew, Beta Kuhn, who set up the red regime in Hungary. A Jew, Kurt Eisner, led the communist putsch in Bavaria.”
10. The two revolutions in Russia were strictly Jewish. They failed in 1905 but were successful in 1917. The Jew Trotsky and Lenin were financed by the international Jew bankers, foremost of whom was Kuhn Loeb & Co. of New York, a Rothschild affiliate.
11. The Jewish pappr “Morning Freiheit, ” New York,Aug.7, 1936: “‘Every Jew must support the struggle of the People’s Front Government in Spain” (this was the communist or Loyalist side). Franco appealed to the Christian world for help to drive the invading communists out. Only Christian Germany and Italy responded. Ninety percent of the Spanish Air Force were German Luftwaffe volunteers. Needless to say, Jew communism suffered a crushing defeat. America as usual, under Jewish control, was on the wrong side, sending the Abraham Lincoln Brigade to aid the communists.
12. England after defeating the Turks held a mandate to keep peace in Palestine. Although they did not own it, they agreed to give it to the Jews for a homeland, in return for the Jews getting America into the war against Germany. Read The Balfour Declaration.
13. The Jews of course were not satisfied in obtaining their own homeland; they wanted it devoid of Arab population. To get the British out in a hurry they started terrorist tactics against their British benefactors. Their most outstanding achievement was blowing up the King David Hotel on July 22, 1946. Almost 100 innocent government officials were buried in the rubble and another sixty were seriously injured.
14. To force the Arabs out, they destroyed entire villages, killing all the men, women and children. Naturally the Arabs in surrounding villages moved out. The Jews then claimed they moved voluntarily. We cite just a few instances.
15. The Oibya Massacre, Oct. 14, 1953 – an entire village bombed at night, killing 42 and wounding 15
16. The bombing of Falama village on Jan. 22 and again on Jan. 29th, 1954.
17. The Nahaline Massacre on March 29, 1954.
18. The Israeli invasion of Sinai and the Gaza sector of Palestine where over 800 young Arabs were murdered in cold blood, according to United Nation’s figures. Mainly they attacked peaceful, isolated Arab villages such as Deir Yasin where 250 men, women and children were tenderly exterminated in cold blood while they were still asleep. The Jewish assassins, including Menahim Begin, boasted of this foul deed, calling it a masterpiece of military tactics. In Oalkilya 820 houses out of 1,100 were bulldozed. Over 100,000 men, women and children in Lydda and Ramieh were driven into the desert.
From the Official Report of the United Nations General Assembly titled, “Report of Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Occupied Territories. ” This is not rumor but documented testimony approved by more than 100 member nations of the U.N. We quote: “A named witness testified that he was tortured by being hanged up by his feet, burned with cigarette butts, given forced enemas loaded with red pepper. He was allowed to hang this way for 16 hours at a time while being beaten with rubber whips that had been reinforced with metal wire (item 90, page 37). -Six Egyptian soldiers lost in the Sinai desert after the six day war were captured and tortured. They were forced to commit acts of homosexuality on one another and they became so desperate that one of the six poured kerosene on his body and destroyed himself with fire (item 94, page 38).
At Naboose Prison Arabs were tortured as follows:
Suspension of the individual by his hands and simultaneous traction of his other members until consciousness was lost.
Burns by cigarette stubs.
Blows by rods on the sexual organs.
Subjected to biting dogs.
Electric shocks in the temples, the mouth and the sexual extremities (item 108, page 43).
Many homes were demolished with the families still in them (item 116,page 46). The, encouragement of homosexual assault on Arab prisoners is scandalous and disgraceful beyond belief” (page 115). From this shocking report, which all U.N. members are well aware of, it is obvious that insanity is the norm for the Jewish Race. THE BEHAVIOR PATTERN OF THE NORMAL JEW IS IDENTICAL TO THAT OF AN INSANE CHRISTIAN.
In February 1945, when the war was practically over, the city of Dresden was destroyed to satisfy the lust of the Jews. Dresden was the culture center of Germany and not a military or industrial target. Hundreds of thousands of Christian anti-communists, fleeing the advancing Red Armies, had swelled the population to well over a million. Such a concentration of defenseless Christians was too much for the Jews to resist. On Feb. 13th Shrove Tuesday, a Christian holiday, and Feb. 14th, which was both Ash Wednesday and Valentine’s Day, the Jews knew the entire population would be celebrating in the streets, parades, costumes, floats, etc. On Feb. 13th at 10:13 P.M. British bombers dropped hundreds of thousands of fire bombs. Three hours later at 1:13 A.M. they returned with such a heavy concentration, a firestorm developed, sucking all the oxygen out of the city. Later in the morning at 12:12 P.M. a huge force of American Bl 7s destroyed what was left of the city. After the Bl 7s left, American P51 fighters came in low and killed anything that moved in the city and along the river banks. Over 250,000 men, women and children were slaughtered by Jew controlled England and America. This was nothing but massive Jewish ritual murder. THIS RAID COULD NOT HAVE BEEN CARRIED OUT WITHOUT THE BLESSING OF THE DRUNKEN SWINE CHURCHILL, THE INSIPID EISENHOWER AND THE DEVOUT ZIONIST AGENT HARRY S. TRUMAN.
In Bleiberg, Austria, 250,000 Croatian soldiers and civilians had crossed the border to escape the Tito communists. But they were stopped at Bleiberg by British troops under Marshall Harold Alexander. He told them to surrender, give up their arms and return to Yugoslavia. Furthermore he assured them that the British and Yugoslav government had made an agreement whereby all Croatian prisoners of war would be treated according to international law and set free.
All civilians would be escorted home. They turned in their arms, then the British sent them back across the border to Tito who murdered all of them. These poor innocent Christians accepted the word of the British, not understanding that a nation no longer has any honor, when it is ruled by Jews.
At the end of hostilities there were 30,000 Cossacks in and around Lienz. Many thousands of them had left Russia between 1917 and 1920, so were never Soviet citizens. The Cossack Camp at Peggetz was in charge of British Major Davis. On May 28th he ordered all Cossack officers, military officials and physicians to attend a conference with higher British officials, promising they would be returned at 6 P.M. the same day: “I assure you on my word of honor as a British Officer, you are just going to a conference.” These 2,749 Cossacks, of whom 2,201 were officers, were driven to a prisoner of war camp at Spittal, Austria, then forcefully repatriated to Russia and certain death. One Cossack officer remarked, “The NKVD would have slain us with truncheons, the British did it with their word of honor. ”
General Vlasov defected to the Germans with thousands of troops,’planning to return to Russia after Jew communism was defeated. The Americans and British dropped millions of leaflets promising asylum if they surrendered. Many civilians joined Vlasov and surrendered to escape the oncoming Russian hordes, just over 900,000 in all. The British and Americans broke their word as usual and repatriated each and every one to Russia. Viasov, his officers and many intellectuals among the civilians, were hung; the young and healthy sent to Siberia; the elderly and those in poor health were exterminated.
Two hundred Soviet Nationals were interned here in the United States in Seattle, Wash. They also had surrendered to the Americans after being assured that they would never be repatriated to Russia against their will. The Army attempted to ship them back to Russia from Seattle, but they reacted so violently, some even committing suicide, they were transferred to Ft. Dix, New Jersey. There, on being forced to board a Soviet ship, they fought with their bare hands, finally disabling the ship’s engines. The next try was successful; the Army drugged their coffee, put them on another Soviet ship, and off they sailed to a meeting with Stalin’s hangmen, with the best wishes of Eisenhower and Truman.
The Katyn forest Massacre has an interesting angle recently revealed. The Russians murdered 15,000 Polish Officers and intellectuals burying them in mass graves. The Allies of course tried to blame the Germans when they were not even in that area at the time. The communists had dossiers of all the population of Poland. When they moved in, Stalin ordered the execution of all who might lead the Polish people to resist. Ropes were cut in advance, all the same length, and, with their hands tied behind them, the victims were forced to kneel; then one bullet in the back of each head solved the problem of the Polish Patriots. Stalin knew full well that even his bloodthirsty Mongolian troops did not have the stomach for such a slaughter, so he hand-picked Jews to do the actual killing. He knew the Jews would not only do it, but enjoy every minute of it. Remember, the Talmud teaches the Jew that the killing of Christians is like killing wild animals. The Jews assassinated many individuals who did not go along with their plans. We list just a few well known victims: Czar Alexander I and Alexander II, Czar Nicholas II, his Czarina and their four daughters, Alexander of Yugoslavia, Archduke Francis-Ferdinand, King Henry IV, Gustav II, Louis XVI and his family, King Carlos, Huey Long and Abraham Lincoln, here in America.
When someone asks you “Which is the greatest threat to what remains of the free world, Russia or Red China?” you can be sure that person has not done his homework. The greatest threat is the Jew controlled United States of America. Without our dedicated aid, communism would have expired long ago. Your tax money and mine have built Jew communism into a world power. In fact, little Germany would have destroyed communism if the United States had not entered the war at the insistence of today’s Pharisees, the Jews.
Yes, the Pharisees have quite a record of accomplishments. God warns us often throughout the Bible not to let strangers (other races) rule over us. We do far worse: we select the one race that is genetically insane, then praise this Babylonian world they have given us.
From the book “You Gentiles” by Zionist leader Maurice Samuels: “We Jews are destroyers – even in the instruments of destruction to which we turn for relief. Jews will remain destroyers forever. Nothing that you do will meet with our demands.”
Now that you have a few examples of the behavior pattern of the Talmudists throughout the years, I believe you must agree that their behavior substantiates all the documentation- THE JEWS ARE THE PHARISEES AND THEY ARE INSANE.
An outstanding Christian, who, when history is rewritten truthfully, will be hailed as one of the great Martyrs of this century, said it all in one “As the potato bug destroys the potato and the potato field because it is his nature to do so, the Jew destroys people and nations. ”
Jeremiah was well aware of the position we would be in today because of the insane Pharisaic Jew (Jeremiah 5: 31):
“There is a shameful and horrible thing in the country! The preachers preach falsehood, and the priests trick with their hands – and my people love to have it so – and what can be done viler that that?”
Also edited for grammar, correctness, etc.
The True Hebrews
“This recording has been appended to the Christogenea Saturdays program for January 27th, 2018. It merits this separate posting.
What if Jesus were descended from the Israelite tribe of Judah, as the Scripture says that He is? Well, of course He is, because the Scriptures do not lie. But what if the people known as Jews today were NOT of the tribe of Judah? Nor even of Benjamin or Levi? Then how could Jesus possibly be a Jew? The answer is easy, Jesus is not a Jew because the people known as Jews today are not of Judah. The Bible itself tells us this.
For this reason Jesus Himself told the church at Smyrna, in Revelation 2:9: “I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.”
Just in case that is not understood, Jesus also said to the church at Philadelphia, in Revelation 3:9: “Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.”
So according to Jesus Himself, the people calling themselves Jews at this time are not “real” Jews, meaning that they are not actually of the tribe of Judah. But how can that be? First, we will see that Paul of Tarsus agrees with Jesus, and the events which Luke recorded in Acts chapter 26 had actually transpired about 35 years before John recorded the Revelation.
In Acts chapter 26, as Paul addressed King Herod Agrippa II, he spoke about the promise of the Gospel and he said: “6 And now I stand and am judged for the hope of the promise made of God unto our fathers: 7 Unto which promise our twelve tribes, instantly serving God day and night, hope to come. For which hope’s sake, king Agrippa, I am accused of the Jews.”
So according to Paul, the promises in Christ are for “our twelve tribes”, meaning the twelve tribes of the children of Israel. But the Jews, whom Paul mentions as an entity distinct and apart from the twelve tribes, were opposed to that promise, and therefore on account if it, they were making accusations against Paul. You won’t find too many modern so-called pastors preaching on this passage from Acts.
To Paul of Tarsus, the twelve tribes are not “Jews”, and the Jews are not the twelve tribes. That is why Paul had a Gospel message to the nations of Europe, because that is where the twelve tribes were. But that is a different story entirely.
One place in the Bible where the confusion is cleared up a bit is in Romans chapter 9. Here are some excerpts, with brief explanations, and we shall use the King James Version:
1 I say the truth in Christ, I lie not, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Ghost, 2 That I have great heaviness and continual sorrow in my heart. 3 For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh: 4 Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises; 5 Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen.
So Paul is concerned for his “kinsmen according to the flesh”, those who are really Israelites, and here he is praying for them. He is grieved that many of them have not yet accepted Christ, because for them are the promises, covenants, and other things which should be associated with Christianity. Then he continues:
6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
Here it is evident that not everyone in Israel, claiming to be an Israelite, or at that time least a Judaean (“Jew”), are legitimate descendants from or heirs of Isaac. Paul continues:
8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
The promise was the promise made to Isaac, which was despised by his son Esau, and therefore it was inherited by his other son, Jacob. The people in Judaea claimed to be Judaeans, and they were not. They held the label of “Israel”, but they were not the children of the promise, as Paul in the verse which follows tells us which promise he means:
9 For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and Sara shall have a son. 10 And not only this; but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by our father Isaac;
And Rebecca was the mother of Jacob and Esau, and as he explains here, she also had a promise. So Paul continues and shows how the Scripture distinguishes between Jacob and Esau:
11 (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;) 12 It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger. 13 As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.
So the election might stand, as God had chosen and promised the inheritance to Jacob even before the two sons were born. Later in their lives, it was confirmed on several occasions in Scripture that Jacob was the recipient of the promises, and Esau was excluded.
Paul is comparing Jacob and Esau here because “they are not all Israel, which are of Israel”, and he is explaining that it is because many of them are from Esau, they are Edomites, and not Israelites after all. For that same reason, Christ had told them in John chapter 10: “26 But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you.” Christ never told His enemies that they were not His sheep because they did not believe Him. Rather, He told them quite the opposite, that they did not believe Him because they were not His sheep.
If the Jews are from Esau, and if Jesus is of the tribe of Judah, then how could Jesus be a Jew?
In John chapter 8 we see the following exchange between Jesus and these Jews, starting with verse 32 where Jesus is speaking:
32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. 33 They answered him, We be Abraham’s seed, and were never in bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free?
The Israelites had always considered themselves as having been in bondage in Egypt. The true Judaeans had considered themselves as having been in bondage in Babylon. While Edomites were subject to Israel in the days of David and Solomon, these Pharisees obviously did not concede these things. So we continue in John chapter 8:
34 Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin. 35 And the servant abideth not in the house for ever: but the Son abideth ever. 36 If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.
The children of Israel are freed from the bondage of sin in Christ, as Paul explained frequently, and as John also explained at length in his first epistle. Otherwise, there is no propitiation for sin after Christ. Again continuing with John 8:37, Christ tells His adversaries:
37 I know that ye are Abraham’s seed; but ye seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you.
They did not believe Him, as He explained, because they were not His sheep. The only Judaeans who could be Abraham’s seed, and yet not be true Israelites, are the descendants of Esau, the Edomites, as well as those of Judah’s Canaanite son Shelah, and the Ishmaelites. History and Scripture demonstrate that the Edomites were in Judaea at this time and in large numbers, and that they had taken on the laws and customs of the Judaeans. There is also evidence in Scripture for the presence of some people who were descended from other groups as well, but these are the main groups, Israelite Judaeans and Edomites Judaeans. In the first century, Judaea was a Roman province of diverse races, and not truly an ethnic description.
The famous Geographer, Strabo, who lived and wrote to about 25 AD, attested that the Idumaeans, or Edomites, were “mixed up” with the Judaeans, and that they “joined the Judaeans, and shared in the same customs with them” (Strabo, Geography, Book 16, chapter 2 [16.2.34]). The late first century Judaean historian, Flavius Josephus, supplies all of the historic details of Strabo’s statement. In Ezekiel chapter 35, in verse 10, we see a prophecy that Esau would take for himself the lands of Israel and Judah after the people were deported by the Assyrians and Babylonians. The Classical records tell us that this did indeed happen. Then, where he discussed the period of the Hasamonaean dynasty, called the Maccabees, which ruled Judaea from about 156 BC to the time of Herod around 36 BC, Josephus describes how certain of them forcibly converted to Judaism all of the Edomites of what later became known as Judaea.
In his Antiquities, Book 13, from line 257 Josephus described how the high priest John Hyrcanus, some time around 125 BC, had forced the conversion and circumcision of the Edomites of Dora and Marissa and their environs, where Josephus said that “they were hereafter considered to be Judaeans.” Then later, in that same book of Josephus’ Antiquities, from line 393, we see the much greater extent of the conversion of the surrounding Edomite and other non-Israelite peoples to Judaism, which took place while Alexander Janneus was high priest and king, from 103 to 76 BC. Here Josephus described the conversion of at least 30 different cities and towns at this time, many of which places which were inhabited by Edomites and other Canaanites. Students of the Old Testament should understand that the Canaanites were a people accursed by God, and that Esau really lost his birthright because he had taken Canaanite wives.
From this point the Edomites eventually came to dominate all of Jerusalem and Judaea, including the Temple, which they had full control of by the time of Christ. Herod was an Edomite, as Josephus also attests, and began appointing his own cronies and partisans to positions in the Temple. That is why the position of priest is often distinguished from the Levites in the New Testament. That is why Christ, in John chapter 8, conceded that they were of Abraham’s seed, because they were indeed descendants of Esau. That they were not Israelites is attested to both in that same chapter where Christ told them that they were children of the devil, that first murderer Cain, and in John 10:26 where Christ told them “But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep”. They were not His sheep because they were not Israelites, but Edomites. The links from Esau to Cain lie in the genes of his Canaanite wives, and the intermingling of Kenites and Canaanites which is evident throughout the history of the Old Testament, and suggested in Genesis chapter 15. So descendants of Esau are also descendants of Canaan and Cain.
Returning to John chapter 8, in the verse which follows, Christ denies that these Judaeans have a common origin with Himself:
38 I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father. 39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham. 40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham. 41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.
Esau had married the daughters of the Canaanites, Hittites, and race-mixing is called fornication in the New Testament (i.e. Jude 7, 1 Corinthians 10). The Ishmaelites and children of Shelah were also mixed in this same manner. In the decades before Christ, many of the tribe of Judah were also mixing with these people. While these Judaeans denied it, they were indeed products of fornication. Here in this exchange between Jesus and the Jews we have a fulfillment of the prophecy found in Malachi chapter 2, especially at verse 11, where it says:
7 For the priest’s lips should keep knowledge, and they should seek the law at his mouth: for he is the messenger of the LORD of hosts. 8 But ye are departed out of the way; ye have caused many to stumble at the law; ye have corrupted the covenant of Levi, saith the LORD of hosts. 9 Therefore have I also made you contemptible and base before all the people, according as ye have not kept my ways, but have been partial in the law. 10 Have we not all one father? hath not one God created us? why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother, by profaning the covenant of our fathers? 11 Judah hath dealt treacherously, and an abomination is committed in Israel and in Jerusalem; for Judah hath profaned the holiness of the LORD which he loved, and hath married the daughter of a strange god. 12 The LORD will cut off the man that doeth this, the master and the scholar, out of the tabernacles of Jacob, and him that offereth an offering unto the LORD of hosts.
Malachi was a prophet of the second temple period, and his book of prophecy foretold of John the Baptist as well as of Christ Himself. Malachi chapter 2 is therefore entirely relevant to the ministry of Christ. These Judaeans may have been descended from Abraham, but because they were not true Israelites, Christ told them “my word hath no place in you.” Then he continues to explain to them that they are indeed bastards:
42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me. 43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. 44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. 45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.
This is why Paul compared Jacob and Esau in reference to Judaea in Romans chapter 9, and in Hebrews chapter 12 Paul described Esau as a “fornicator, or profane person” because he was a race-mixer and had no legitimate offspring.
While some of the Pharisees, which were, basically, a political and religious sect, were indeed Israelites, many were not. But the high priests and most of the “gang” that ran the temple during the entire period from the death of the first Herod to the destruction of Jerusalem were not Pharisees, but Sadducees, a group which Jesus never even directly addressed, unless they accosted Him. The Sadducees were the most consistent adversaries of Paul and the other apostles as well. So while it cannot be imagined that all of the adversaries of Christ were of the same mind or origin, speaking to the leaders of the temple, whom John called “the Jews” in chapter 10 of his Gospel, Jesus said to them:
26 But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you.
As we have just explained, Jesus did not tell the Jews that they were not His sheep because they did not believe Him. That is what the denominational churches teach, and they have it wrong. Jesus told the Jews that they did not believe Him because they were not his sheep! In other words, the Jews who opposed him were not the people of Israel for whom Jesus came. Paul later tells us in Romans, as we have also already described, that not all of the people of Israel were actually of Israel. So we see why these people were not His sheep, and we see why Christ later told us in the Revelation that there were “them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.”
As Paul consistently taught in his epistles, the Judaeans who accepted Christ became one with Greeks who accepted Christ, and they lost their identity as Judaeans. Judaeans who were His sheep heard His voice and eventually lost their identity as Judaeans, becoming Christians. Today’s Jews are descended from all of those Jews who rejected Christ, who were not His sheep in the first place.
So how could Jesus be a Jew?
Insisting that Jesus is a Jew like these modern Jews is like believing that the founding fathers of our own nation were negroes, because most of the current residents of Washington DC, Philadelphia and the rest of our major cities today are Negroes. There may be some White people in Washington, or Baltimore, or Atlanta right now, but neither does that make them negroes. Likewise, Jesus was not a Jew. He was a man of the tribe of Judah, and today’s Jews are clearly not of Judah.”
He that soweth the good seed, are the seed of Adam
(Satan has children on the earth)
You are of your father the devil
Matthew – the enemy?
John 8:44 You are of your father the Devil
John 8:47 You are not of God
Which say they are Jews and are not, but are of the Synagogue of Satan
Nowhere in the bible does it say that God Changed the name of Israel to Jew. It does Say that he changed Abram to Abraham and Jacob to Israel
Saul – Benjamenite – First King over Jacob Israel
John was first of Jacob/Israel who was called Baptist
Moses was not a jew.
David or his Son Solomon, not called Jews.
You don’t find the word Jew in the entire first 11 books of the bible (They racially claim the first 5 as the Torah)
Who was the first Jew?
The first mention of the word Jews is in II Kings 16:6 and then only in translations revised in 18th century.
II Kings 16 Jacob/Israel was at War with the Jews
Matthew 13: Parable of Wheat and Tare.
Mixed Multitude went away, he was sent only to the Lost Sheep of Jacob/Israel (Matthew 15 and Matthew 10)
End of Matthew 13:39 The enemy sowed them that Satan
Here’s a paradox, a paradox, a most ingenious paradox: an anthropological fact, many Christians may have much more Hebrew-Israelite blood in their veins than most of their Jewish neighbors.
Alfred M. Lilienthal, Jr., What Price Israel (Chicago: Henry Regnery Company, 1953) p. 223
And I fell at his feet to worship him. And he said unto me, See thou do it not: I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren that have the testimony of Jesus: worship God: for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.
For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.
For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews:
Who both killed the Jesus Christ, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:
1 Thessalonians 2:14-15
And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers.
Woe unto you! for ye build the sepulchres of the prophets, and your fathers killed them.
Truly ye bear witness that ye allow the deeds of your fathers: for they indeed killed them, and ye build their sepulchres.
Therefore also said the wisdom of God, I will send them prophets and apostles, and some of them they shall slay and persecute:
That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from the foundation of the world, may be required of this generation;
From the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, which perished between the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required of this generation.
Jesus talking to the Priestly Jewish Class?
But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?
“Jesus, the minister of compassion, when he was asked to cure a Canaanite, denounced them as dogs. Matthew 15:22: “And, behold, a Canaanite woman from that region came out and cried, ‘Have mercy on me, o Lord, son of David; my daughter is severely possessed by a demon.’ But He did not answer her a word.” At last He did answer her, verse 26, “And He answered, ‘It is not fair to take the children’s bread and throw it to the dogs.” By children, He meant the children of Israel, and that the Canaanites were dogs. She persisted and he finally did heal her daughter.
The Canaanite political parties were the Pharisees, Sadducees, Zealots, Essains, Assissins, Herodians, and Scribes. A later group, the Edomites, descended from Esau and later intermarried with the Turks, producing a Turco- Edomite mixture which later became known as the Chazars, the present occupants of Israel, according to the great Jewish scholar, Arthur Koestler.
The Canaanites were divided into the Amorites, Hittites, Moabites, Midianites, Philistines, Ammonites, Edomites, Zidonians, Sepharvaims, Perizzites, and affiliated tribes, all of which are routinely denounced in the Bible. Genesis 3:17: “The Perizzites are the enemies of God; the Ammonites worshipped Moloch Chemos and were demon-possessed.”
The demonic nature of this sex worship is traced directly to Ham’s intercourse with the witch Naamah on the Ark. Col. Garnier, in his “Worship of the Dead,” writes, “Naamah was celebrated for her beauty, talent, energy, lustfulness, and cruelty, and she was of Nephilim (fallen angel) parentage.”
“There are many people who can agree that the kings and leaders of the Western nations are descended from the tribe of Judah, but they fail to recognize an important fact, which is entirely omitted in the King James version of the Bible, that there were three branches of the tribe of Judah. Those who lump all the descendants of the tribe of Judah together do not realize that there was a tainted branch. There were the families of Pharez and Zarah, Judah’s pure bred sons out of Tamar, and there was a third branch, Judah’s descendants from a Canaanite mother, Shuah, who were known ever afterwards as “the cursed Shelanites.” Tamar was the daughter of Aram, the youngest son of Shem.
Shuah called Tamar’s sons bastards because they had been born out of wedlock, while the twins claimed to be the rightful heirs of Judah because they were of pure-blooded stock, the Adamite strain. From the Shelanites descended thirty-one cursed tribes of Canaanites of Judea and Samaria, including the Sepharvaims, a name which the Canaanites had adopted for deceptive purposes.”
~Eustace Mullins, Curse of Canaan
“In his definitive work, “The Magical Mason,” W. Wynn Westcott, the founder of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn in England, traces the origins of the Freemasons back to the Essenes in Jerusalem; Pharisaic Jews, the practitioners of the most strict Judaism; the ancient Mysteries of Egypt and Greece; the Vehm-Gerichte of Westphalia in Germany; the trade guilds of the Middle Ages; the Roman Collegia; the French Compagnons; and the Rosicrucians. Westcott points out that the cornerstone of the Capitol of Rome has the keystone mark of “the Overseers,” a sacred group.
The Royal Arch has an altar of white stone in the form of a double cube; it is engraved with “the Sacred Name.” He says that the Mysteries, from which all Masonic ritual is derived, were intended to end the fear of death in the initiate, by re-enacting the descent into Hades, and thus finding the great first cause of all things revealed to the initiate. Westcott claims that the famous Black Stone in the Sacred Mosque at Mecca is also part of this ritual. There is also the Sacred Stone placed beneath the Throne of England, which is said to have been the Stone of Jacob in Biblical times. From such ancient symbols of power came the Masonic motto, “Per me reges regnant,” “through me kings reign.” By controlling kings, the Masons exercised their power from behind the scenes. If the kings were overthrown by revolutions (which were often of organized by the Freemasons themselves), the kings might be beheaded, but the instigators behind the throne would be forewarned and escape unscathed. They would then continue to reign through the next chosen leader, usually designated by their inner councils.
Although it is dedicated to the usurpation and maintenance of absolute power through an Oriental despotism, Freemasonry has attained much of its worldwide influence through its emphasis on and sponsorship of the power of revolutions against the established order. Their slogan became the motto of the French Revolution, “Liberte, egalite, fraternie.” Liberty, equality, that is, equality for Masons only, with slavery as the fate of everyone else, and fraternity, that is the brotherhood of the Masonic Order of the Canaanites.
This slogan appears throughout documents of Freemasonry, which also advertises itself as “The New Age” movement. Many of its publications, such as the magazine of the Washington Freemasons in our nation’s capital, feature the name, The New Age, and the symbolic triangle on the cover of its magazine, the triangle being emblazoned in its borders with the motto, “Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity.” The New Age, or New Order, refers to the era which will be inaugurated after the final Armageddon, when the Canaanites exterminate the last survivors of the people of Shem.”
~Eustace Mullins, Curse of Canaan 32
Parable Of The Tares
Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field:
But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way.
But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also.
So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? from whence then hath it tares?
He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?
He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him,
Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?
But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.
Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.
Then Jesus sent the multitude away, and went into the house: and his disciples came unto him, saying, Declare unto us the parable of the tares of the field.
He answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man;
The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one;
The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels.
As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.
The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity;
And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.