Gravity Does Not Exist
“There is not a single profession, not one, that uses the pagan fiction globe, not one. As a pilot my self I can tell you Aviation has never used the pagan fiction globe, not today, not ever. We don’t even recognize “gravity”
How Do Flat Earthers Explain Gravity?
Index:
Newton & Occult Origins of Gravity
Math Abused
Debunking Gravity
Gravity has “evolved” over time…
First Gravity was described by newton as: an attractive force present in all objects
Second by Einstein as the Curvature of Space-Time
Thirdly by quantum theorists – hypothetic subatomic particles called Gravitons…
Electrostatics are Stronger by Far
Tides
Nonexistent Centrifugal Force (slinging everything away from Earth as we spin.)
Incompatible with Elasticity – Self Propulsion of Matter (Think Big Bang)
Other
Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Expansion Rate
Density Vs Buoyancy
Buoyancy Defies the Gravitational Theory of Mass Attracting Mass
Relative Density
Antigravitational Force
The Cavendish Experiment for proving Mass Attracts Mass
Conclusion
Fun Facts
Video Resources:
Questions about Gravity for Skeptics
Rebuttals
Newton & Occult Origins of Gravity
Herme’s Emerald Tablets Source of Debunked Heliocentric Gravity Theory – Newton Was An Occultist
Obsessed with Pagan Sun Worship and Gravity theories from the preflood world.
Terrified it would be discovered…
Practitioners of the occult
Ancient Pagans unanimously engaged in Sun Worship, which passed through the teachings of Hermes / Thoth to the Roman Papacy’s Scientific “Learning against learning” strategy to counter the reformation.
Theories they, in some instances, even refused to have their names attached to:
Newton didn’t even believe in Gravity!
They are lying to you
Math Abused
Math is most peoples weakest area, for myself – my mind is philosophical and analytical, I am trained in logic – and logic beats math, so let me discuss the math arguments which STAND, as I understand it. Because going to those wiser than I in areas I am weak is the logical thing to do.
Refraction
“Globe Faithful use of refraction is a joke. How ever far we can see something. They just say that refraction is lifting it. They even have a calculator that they turn the dial up til they see the item then claim that’s refraction. The math they currently use for “standard refraction is 7/6r so they essentially make the earth larger so that we see items further away and then claim the atmosphere causes it.”
Rob Skiba Demonstrates Refraction on Biblical Flat Earth – Experiment!
Globe Math shows 6′ of height loss at 3 miles, nearly 11′ at 4 miles
For Math to work, we must accept 95% unproven universe
Math Fails at the Third Mile for Average People
Simply Have 6 ‘ foot people zoom in at 3 miles – if you can see below their neck, its not a pear shaped globe (or its far, far larger than they claim)
If the earth were round, using the mathematical equation to calculate curvature…not only would anything 40 miles away be over 800ft below the horizon, but IF we could see it, it would be seen tilting away from us.
Debunking Gravity
To claim the existence of a physical law without a single practical evidential example is hearsay, not science. This magical concept sometimes causes things to come together, sometimes to orbit one another.
What happens if we jump off a cliff? We fall through the less dense air and float in the more dense water…Even Newton Debunks Gravity
Gravity is an unproven theory turned assumption treated as fact. The entirety of astrophysics begins with the assumption that Gravity exists then continues forward. It is in complete violation of sound scientific reasoning to bypass necessary verification of some aspect of science and regard it as fact.
Example of similar flawed logic: Sometimes socks go missing. We don’t always have a good reason for it, so maybe its sock gnomes. We know A. Socks go missing and B. We don’t have a reason so C. It must be gnomes.
If you fill a balloon with helium, a substance lighter than the nitrogen, oxygen and other elements which compose the air around it, the balloon will immediately fly upwards. If you blow a dandelion seed out of your hands, a substance just barely heavier than the air, it will float away and slowly but eventually fall to the ground. And if you drop an anvil from your hands, something much heavier than the air, it will quickly and directly fall straight to the ground. Now, this has absolutely nothing to do with “gravity.” The fact that light things rise up and heavy things fall down is simply a natural property of weight. That is very different from “gravity.” Gravity is a hypothetical magnetic-like force possessed by large masses which Isaac Newton needed to help explain the heliocentric theory of the universe.
Gravity has “evolved” over time…
First Gravity was described by newton as: an attractive force present in all objects
Common Rebuttal: “People are too small to exert noticeable gravitational force”
Counter Rebuttal: Then how were the initial molecules brought together which formed the Earth?
Einstein was a total occultist, also: see Sir Isaac Newton – Last of the Magicians section of SCIENTISM – The Cult of False Sciences and the Heliosorcery Post & Documentary
Second by Einstein as the Curvature of Space-Time
This version claims points in space are defined as events, time is a fourth physical dimension existing length, breadth, and thickness. As Einstein critic Gerrard Hickson wrote in his book, Kings Dethroned: “While claiming time as a fourth dimension, Einstein explains that by “Dimension” we must understand merely one of four independent quantities which locate an event in space. This is to imply that the other three dimensions which are in common use are independent quantities – which is not the case. For length breadth and thickness are essentially found in combination – they coexist in each and every physical thing, so that they are related. Hence, they are not independent quantities. On the contrary, time is an independent quantity. It is independent of any one or all the three proportions of material things – it is not in any way related, and therefore cannot be used as a fourth dimension.
Einstein was a total fraud, also: See the Modern “Scientists” segment of SCIENTISM – The Cult of False Sciences
Thirdly by quantum theorists – hypothetic subatomic particles called Gravitons…
They are passing it off onto the only field of science, where it is explicitly claimed that anything is possible – meaning: we can postulate anything beyond logical structured rules of science and they are exempt from normal laws of the universe.
And lately its more we don’t know!
Scientists Admit They Dont Know How Strong The Force of Gravity Is
Electrostatics are Stronger by Far
If electrostatics is 10^36 power stronger than Gravity even claims to be in all molecular and intermolecular attractive forces electrostatic nature, which I could cite Purdue University…
Gravity is no longer considered an intrinsic property of matter its now considered an effect of the bending and warping of space and time.
~Austin Witsit, Debate Monster
Walter Lewin, subject matter expert for “mainstream” cosmology Says: “It is really the electric forces that hold our world together”
Tides
Tides change twice each day, yet the moon only traverses our plane once. Tides only happen in our ocean – the largest body of water on Earth, and larger than our moon. If gravity existed, the ocean’s tides would affect the moons orbit, not the other way around.
Electromagnetics – better explanation
Gravity Questions:
Is it properly derived scientific method? Observable, Repeatable, Measurable?
Do you believe or can you demonstrate in a vacuum or in space throwing marbles out, and them sticking to one another? Or orbiting you as the larger object?
If Gravity is a downward force, then why would anything move upward? Does the Sun only impact certain things?
How or why would huge solid planets orbit around a giant flaming ball of gas?
What is Orbit? And why is it never observed? But is the reason the moon goes around the Earth, and the Earth around the sun? But nothing on smaller scale EVER orbits?
Why would water stick to the outside of a convex surface?
How do we stick to the outside of a ball spinning and orbiting 32x faster than a bullet.
How does an object spin forever without ever succumbing to friction?
How does the Earth propel itself to remain in constant motion around the sun, without any fuel or burning any energy to sustain such immense velocities?
How does the moon go around the earth with no energy required at a grueling pace?
How does any of this take place without any form of energy consumption to maintain these motions and velocities?
Can you see how many facts of physics gravity ignores?
In a vacuum: why doesn’t the hammer and feather orbit?
Tide Questions:
How do lakes and ponds avoid tide pull from moon gravity? they are smaller and less heavy
If the moon’s velocity and path are uniform, why are the tides not uniform? Tides are not uniform.
Nonexistent Centrifugal Force (slinging everything away from Earth as we spin.)
They tried to debunk this image, using this one. They are deceptive.
“They like to lie and pretend. They don’t refer to the mph. Just rotations per day. 1. However. Let’s say that a merry go round is going along. Let’s say it takes 30 secs to go around once. So twice a minute times 60 = 120/hr x 24 =2880.
So does that mean that 2880 rotations per day is faster than 1? Of course not. The distance traveled is important. Let’s say that the circumference of the merry go round is 100 ft. So it goes around 120 times an hour. Or 120×100 or 12000 feet per hour. That’s 2.25 mph.
So in order for us to make it feel like it should on the earth. We can see how many times the carousel needs to go around to equal 1000mph. Well that’s 500x faster. So remember it was going 2 times a minute. So x 500 is 1000x a minute or /60 is 16.66 times a second.
So when you jump on a carousel that is zooming at 16.66 times a second. Then we can compare it apples to apples.”
~Jeranism
Nonexistent Centrifugal Force Questions:
Why does the Earth at its furthest ellipse not fly off into space? If the force of the sun is such that it can bring back the Earth fleeing it from its furthest point, why does it not bring the earth to crash into it when its at its closest and strongest gravitationally?
How does Gravity overcome the centrifugal (outward pushing) forces of being slung outward like a gravitron fair ride?
Incompatible with Elasticity – Self Propulsion of Matter (Think Big Bang)
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Other
Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Expansion Rate
“Mass attracts Mass” – Disproven
Heat Lowers Weight:
Heat Lowers Weight – Gravity is a lie
Heat Lowers Weight – Yet Sun creates gravity?
Density Vs Buoyancy
Gravity Contested (Buoyancy and Density work better)
Weight: a body’s relative mass or the quantity of matter contained by it, giving rise to a downward force; the heaviness of a person or thing.
The real reason things go up and down is buoyancy and density. Buoyancy not only is a better explanation for up and down than Gravity, it actually debunks gravity!
Buoyancy Defies the Gravitational Theory of Mass Attracting Mass:
If I drop an empty balloon, it will fall. If I add mass to it in the form of Helium, it will rise again – in defiance of gravity which should be stronger, not weaker.
Why should adding mass negate the effect of mass attracting mass? There is no force in physics which propels an object in one direction, and when force is increased it repels the object in the opposite direction. Its a law of nature if X forces push an object Y feet then increasing X would only increase Y in the same direction assuming both X forces are in the same direction.
Common Rebuttal: Buoyancy Moves The Balloon Up, the Heavier more dense air being pulled under the helium balloon causing it to rise.
Counter Rebuttal: Yet gravitational faithful claim all objects of different masses fall at the same rate? So why would gravity pull air molecules down harder or faster if objects fall at the same rate?
Helium balloons are not pulled to the ground, everything seeks its relative density. A feather and anvil will both fall at different rates because one is radically denser than the air and the other is not. This debunks the supposed uniform speed of acceleration due to gravity (9.8 meters per second squared” refers to the acceleration due to gravity on Earth) which would more accurately be labeled something like the maximum acceleration towards density equilibrium – as long as something has enough mass and is aerodynamic enough to negate the air resistance of the fall, objects will fall at the same rate of approximately 9.8 meters per second squared. When in a vacuum chamber, the factor of air resistance is removed completely – so everything will fall at the same rate, so a hammer and feather have different masses but fall at the same rate in a vacuum.
This shows that mass is not the deciding factor of why things fall as the rate they do.
This is shown to be true because if you change the mass, the rate of descent is not affected.
Lets change the medium and see if it changes the rate of descent:
To Air: the feather slightly changes its rate, the hammer drastically changes
To Water: the hammer slightly changes its rate of descent, and the feather would float.
If I jump off a cliff and fall through the air I will break through then rise on the water and float.
Relative Density
Therefore, the change in rate of descent of objects clearly has nothing to do with mass and has everything to do with the objects relative density to the medium surrounding it.
Objects of different masses fall at the same rate in a different vacuum because they are falling through the same medium, and the rate in which they do so is dependent on their relative density compared to that of the medium.
Gravity is said to attract all matter with mass towards all other matter with mass.
Now if gravity is strong enough to pull an empty balloon down, then it must be strong enough to pull even lighter less massive things for the simple fact that mass is the measure of the resistance something has to forces.
Antigravitational Force
Since gravity is a mono pull inward pulling force, and more massive objects are less affected by the momentum caused by it – then gravity should have no trouble pulling helium particles towards the center of the earth. It should be easier than pulling the rubber elastic polymers in the toy balloon? Therefore there should never be any anti gravitation motions by ANY matter seeing as gravity is only pulling one way and uniformly across all molecules.
Think of a flowing current in a river, everything you throw in the current will either go in the direction of the current approaching zero as the object gets more massive. But what you will never have, is an object thrown into the current and without any energy spent it travels against the current. Especially lighter and less dense objects. This antigravitational movement defies other sound laws of physics because they made a wrong assertion using gravity to piece in the other violations of physics.
To think the ground pulls you down is as flawed as thinking the ceiling is pulling the helium balloon up.
Buoyancy Questions:
In a vacuum: why doesn’t the hammer and feather orbit?
The Cavendish Experiment for proving Mass Attracts Mass
FLAT EARTH — Cavendish Debunked.
Cannot be replicated in controlled environment.
Conclusion:
Its a fact that objects set to move in a straight line, in a frictionless environment, continue to move in a straight line. while objects at rest remain at rest. UNLESS gravity exists. Then whatever object caused the object to start moving would eventually cause it to slow, stop, and do a U turn.
Its a fact that a spinning tethered object, once the tether is broken, immediately starts traveling in a straight line tangent to the circle it was rotating around. UNLESS gravity exists. Then it will continue to orb with or without the tether, like heliocentrism.
Its a fact that any non adhered substance or object on the outer surface of a spinning object will fly off from the equatorial line of rotation. Unless gravity exists. Then everything sticks to spinning objects. Without any upward push from the spin, or inward pull from gravity. A spinning planet would have an oceanic mohawk.
Its supposedly a fact of gravity that objects of different masses all fall at the same rate, UNLESS you have a helium balloon – it won’t fall at all, but will rise upward.
Its supposedly a fact of gravity that two objects of appropriate mass will orbit one another, based solely on their relative mass to one another. UNLESS you require an actual demonstration or experiment showing it. Never been done..
Newton should have dropped that apple in water and asked why it floated, instead.
Fun Facts:
If I add enough helium weather balloons, I will ascend into the heavens. If I pop just a small %, I would descend as slowly as a feather.
If I wore shoes made of low density Aerogel, I could walk on water. (Men have done this through faith, also)
Hell: The place below where dense people end up…(Sin & Grace parallel density and buoyancy)
Video Resources:
Dubay’s Breakdown on Gravity
What is GRAVITY? – Spacebusters CLIP w Flat Earth Dave
Questions about Gravity for Skeptics:
Gravity Questions:
Is it properly derived scientific method? Observable, Repeatable, Measurable?
Do you believe or can you demonstrate in a vacuum or in space throwing marbles out, and them sticking to one another? Or orbiting you as the larger object?
If Gravity is a downward force, then why would anything move upward? Does the Sun only impact certain things?
How or why would huge solid planets orbit around a giant flaming ball of gas?
What is Orbit? And why is it never observed? But is the reason the moon goes around the Earth, and the Earth around the sun? But nothing on smaller scale EVER orbits?
Why would water stick to the outside of a convex surface?
How do we stick to the outside of a ball spinning and orbiting 32x faster than a bullet.
How does an object spin forever without ever succumbing to friction?
How does the Earth propel itself to remain in constant motion around the sun, without any fuel or burning any energy to sustain such immense velocities?
How does the moon go around the earth with no energy required at a grueling pace?
How does any of this take place without any form of energy consumption to maintain these motions and velocities?
Can you see how many facts of physics gravity ignores?
Tide Questions:
How do lakes and ponds avoid tide pull from moon gravity? they are smaller and less heavy
If the moon’s velocity and path are uniform, why are the tides not uniform? Tides are not uniform.
Nonexistent Centrifugal Force
Why does the Earth at its furthest ellipse not fly off into space? If the force of the sun is such that it can bring back the Earth fleeing it from its furthest point, why does it not bring the earth to crash into it when its at its closest and strongest gravitationally?
How does Gravity overcome the centrifugal (outward pushing) forces of being slung outward like a gravitron fair ride?
Buoyancy Questions:
In a vacuum: why doesn’t the hammer and feather orbit?
If I drop an empty balloon, it will fall. If I add mass/density to it in the form of Helium, it will rise again – in defiance of gravity which should be stronger, not weaker. Why should adding mass negate the effect of mass attracting mass?
Rebuttals & Counters
Common Rebuttal: “People are too small to exert noticeable gravitational force”
Counter Rebuttal: Then how were the initial molecules brought together which formed the Earth?
Common Rebuttal: *Drops Something* This fell! Gravity!
Counter Rebuttal: Can you prove that the reason it fell is gravity, nothing else? If I drop an empty balloon on the ground, it will fall. If I add mass/density to it in the form of Helium, it will rise again – in defiance of gravity which should be stronger, not weaker.
If I tied what you dropped to my balloon, or a hot air balloon with many thousands of times more density and therefore gravitational force, your item will rise again.
Related:
Biblical Earth Cosmology – FAQ
SCIENTISM – The Cult of False Sciences
Heliosorcery – Rome Weaponized Pagan Occult Fake Science To Debunk God’s Word
In case you missed it:
TheSerapeum.com is 100% listener funded. Thank you for your support in our mission to Break the Cycle of Fake News.
If you value our work please consider supporting us with our vetted patriot sponsors!
Sponsors:
RedPillLiving.com - Health & Beauty - Value Holistics & Quality CarbonShield60 - Doubled Lifespan in Mammal Studies! TimeStop - The Worlds Premier Beauty Cream! With CarbonShield60!
TheGreatAwakeningCoffee.com - Gourmet Coffee for Patriots!
Other Links:
Join our Telegram chat: TheSerapeum.com/chat!